Ambonec
A man and a woman and neither one, all at the same time — one gender, not two taking turns.
- One of twenty-eight Non-Binary identities
- No settled flag
- 15 min read
What it is
Ambonec means both and neither. It comes from Latin — <em>ambo</em>, both; <em>nec</em>, nor. Man and woman and neither one, held together, at once.
The trick is that the two halves do not argue. You are not a man some days and a woman on others. You are not standing at a midpoint between them. You are both, entirely, and also outside the whole arrangement — and to you those are the same fact said twice.
Be warned about the size of this word. It was coined online in the mid-2010s, in the Tumblr wave of gender vocabulary, and the exact origin is not reliably documented. Maybe a few hundred to a few thousand people use it. There is almost no written first-hand account of living with it — no essays, no memoirs, no decades of community argument.
Keep reading
So this page describes what the word claims and who tends to arrive at it. It cannot describe a settled culture, because there isn't one yet. Anyone who tells you there is a canon here is guessing.
People also disagree on the edges. Some hold that ambonec means specifically man and woman and neither. Others use it more loosely, for any gender that is simultaneously full inclusion and full exclusion. Both readings are in active use.
Pronouns
The word says nothing about your pronouns. People who use it land all over: they/them, he, she, he and she both, ey/em, xe/xem, ze/hir, or their name and nothing else.
Some people ask for he and she in rotation, on purpose, because each one is half right and half right twice is closer than neutral. Others find any gendered word abrasive and want they/them everywhere. Both are common.
If your language has no neutral option — Italian, Spanish, Arabic, Hebrew, Hindi, Polish and most others — you are not doing this wrong. People improvise: plurals, avoidance, switching endings mid-sentence, or accepting a mismatch in one language and being precise in another.
Does this sound like you?
Take the test
Twenty questions, about four minutes, nothing leaves your phone. It suggests. You decide.
An ordinary day
Most days gender is not the first thing on your mind. It arrives the way weather arrives — when someone opens a door.
Coffee at half seven. "There you go, sir." It does not sting. It also does not fit. You take the cup and think nothing more about it until the same person says "sorry, madam" to the woman behind you and something in your chest goes: yes, that one too.
Work sorts you before you arrive. The rota, the uniform, the greeting on the phone, the badge. You pick your battles by how many hours are left in the shift. Some days you correct people. Most days you do not, and that is not cowardice, it is arithmetic.
The toilets are a small calculation, every time, adjusted for the building, the clothes, the town, the hour. Then a form with two boxes. Then a group chat where somebody says "ladies" and means you affectionately.
By evening you are usually fine. The word only comes back at night, on your phone, when you go looking again to check whether it still means what you thought it meant.
What people get wrong
How it actually plays out
Love
Being with you scrambles other people's labels, and that lands on your partner as much as on you. Walking down the street you may look like a straight couple to one stranger and a gay couple to the next, in the same minute.
A partner who calls themselves a lesbian, or straight, or gay, may have to sit with the fact that loving you does not fit the shape of their word. Good ones do the sitting. Some cannot, and that is genuinely painful and not always a character flaw.
The specific ache is being loved as one half. When someone relates entirely to the man in you, or entirely to the woman, and is warm and kind about it, and the other half stands in the corner of the room unaddressed. It is not cruelty. It is loneliness with the lights on.
The good version is small and unshowy. A partner who uses two different words for you in one evening without making it a topic. Somebody who says "you" and means all of it.
If you are single, or not looking, or unable to be out with anyone you date, none of that makes the description less accurate.
Desire
In bed, words matter more than they do anywhere else, because there is nowhere to hide behind a job title. The wrong one can stop the whole thing dead.
For some ambonec people the answer is: both, please. Called handsome and beautiful in the same hour. For others it is neither — no gendered words at all, only names and verbs. A fair number have no idea and have never had a safe way to find out.
Orientation labels are a mess here and you may as well know that in advance. Bi and pan get used loosely. Gay and straight get used by people who know they do not technically apply and use them anyway because they are shorter. Some people just say queer and stop explaining.
If you are asexual, that changes nothing about any of this. Gender and desire are separate settings, and one being low or off tells you nothing about the other.
You are also allowed to want to be touched as one thing on Tuesday and the other on Friday without that meaning your gender moved. Bodies and wanting are not the same instrument as identity.
The body
There is no standard body outcome here, and anyone selling you one is wrong.
Some ambonec people want nothing changed. They live in the body they have, dysphoria stays low, and the whole thing is about words rather than flesh. That is a complete version of this and not a lesser one.
Others want changes that do not read as a clean crossing. A flat chest and a voice left alone. Low-dose hormones held deliberately at a halfway point. One surgery and not the next. Waiting rooms are hard for this, because most systems are built around a single destination and want to know which one you have chosen.
Some do transition fully in the usual sense and stay ambonec throughout. Being read consistently as a man or as a woman does not delete what you are — it just means strangers stop asking.
Dysphoria, when it comes, often lands oddly. Not "this is the wrong body" but "this body is being read as a claim I did not make". Euphoria is often just as odd: a shopkeeper hesitating for a second, unable to file you, and something in you settling.
Work
Work gendered you before you got there. The uniform, the greeting script, the badge, the loo signs, the changing room, the way the rota is split.
If you are customer-facing you get gendered forty times a shift by people who will never see you again. Correcting each one is not a plan. Most people build a rule instead — colleagues get the truth, strangers get nothing — and then spend no more energy on it.
Email signatures and HR systems are their own small war. Pronouns in a signature are safe in some offices and a target in others, and only you know which one you are in. There is no obligation to be the educational display.
In trades, kitchens, care work, warehouses, farms, driving — anywhere with a strong shopfloor culture — being out may simply not be available, and the cost of trying is not theoretical. Working somewhere you cannot say this does not make it untrue about you.
Self-employment solves some of it and none of the invoices.
Family
Parents tend to manage one half of this and drop the other. "Both" is often survivable to them — they can picture it, roughly. "Neither" is what makes them go quiet, because it takes away the thing they thought they had.
There is usually one relative who deploys the old pronoun like a correction, sweetly, at dinner, for years. And often one who says nothing, changes nothing out loud, and just quietly gets it right on the phone.
If you live at home, or send money home, or your family is your visa, your housing or your religion, the calculation is not about courage. Staying quiet is a real answer and this page is not going to lecture you about it.
Language does some of the work against you. In a home where every adjective is gendered, there may be no sentence available that is true. People end up settling for the least wrong option and grieving that a bit.
If you have children, they take this astonishingly well, usually inside a week, and then explain you confidently to their friends in words you would never have chosen.
Chosen family counts. For a word this small, it is often where the only real recognition comes from.
Coming out
The hard part is that the accurate sentence sounds like a riddle. "I'm both and I'm neither" invites a debate you did not ask for, from someone who has had two glasses of wine.
So most people use layers. Non-binary to colleagues and the doctor, because it is one word and it is on forms. Ambonec to the two or three people who actually want the detail. Nothing at all to the rest, permanently, on purpose.
If you do want a line, keep it short and concrete: "I'm not a man or a woman — or I'm both, depending how you look at it. He and she are both fine. They is better." People can act on that. They cannot act on a definition.
Expect the follow-up questions to be about your body and your dating life rather than about you. Deciding in advance which ones you will simply not answer saves a lot of evenings.
You do not have to come out to be this. You do not have to come out to anyone, ever, for it to be an accurate description of the last twenty years.
And if you are somewhere where being out is dangerous — legally, at home, at work — the word still works fine in private. It was never for other people's benefit.
Nearby identities
The distinction is the useful part.
Two genders — at once, in turn, or side by side, and countable as two. Ambonec is one gender that happens to include both and stand outside both. If your honest answer is "there are two of them in here", bigender is the closer word.
Compare Ambonec and Bigender →Between man and woman, or a blend of the two. Ambonec is not a midpoint — the "neither" is not a halfway measure, it is a step out of the frame entirely.
Compare Ambonec and Androgyne →Moves. Days, weeks, situations. Ambonec does not move; it is a single fixed thing that happens to be described by two opposing words.
Compare Ambonec and Genderfluid →No gender at all. Shares the "neither" and has none of the "both". If man and woman feel like foreign countries rather than things you contain, look here.
Compare Ambonec and Agender →A gender that exists wholly apart from male and female, with no reference to either. Ambonec keeps both in the picture on purpose. That is the whole difference.
Compare Ambonec and Maverique →Many or all genders. Ambonec is specifically the both-and-neither shape, not an accumulation.
Compare Ambonec and Pangender →Partly a man, or partly a woman, and partly something else. Ambonec is not partial in either direction — it is full, both times.
Demiboy → · Demigirl →The older, wider word for being outside the binary at all. Many ambonec people use it as their public label and keep ambonec for themselves.
Compare Ambonec and Genderqueer →A gender between or combining male and female. In most communities it is reserved for intersex people, and using it if you are not intersex will meet objections.
Compare Ambonec and Intergender →The umbrella ambonec sits under. Not a competitor — most people use both words, one for strangers and one for accuracy.
Compare Ambonec and Non-Binary →An Indigenous North American term, belonging to specific nations and their own traditions and responsibilities. It is not a synonym for both-and-neither and it is not open to people outside those communities. If you are not Indigenous, it is not available to you, however well the description seems to fit.
Compare Ambonec and Two-Spirit →It might not be you if…
- It moves. Man some weeks, woman others, nothing in between — that is genderfluid, and it has far more written about it than this does.
- There are clearly two of them in there, and you can feel the seam. Bigender is the more precise word and the bigger community.
- You feel nothing at all where gender is supposed to be. That is agender, and it is a different shape from "both and neither".
- What you actually mean is that you are a woman who likes being masculine, or a man who wears dresses. That is expression, not gender, and no label change is required for it.
- The "both" is theoretical. If you can only really feel the "neither", non-binary or agender will fit better and cost you less explaining.
- You are describing your body rather than your sense of yourself — being intersex is a fact about physiology, not this word.
- You are drawn to it because it is precise and rare rather than because it named something you had already been living with. Nothing bad happens if you try a word and put it down again in a month.
- You are Indigenous and looking for the word for your role in your own nation. That word is not this one, and it is not for outsiders to hand you.
- You want a label with an existing community, a flag everyone recognises and people to meet. Be honest with yourself — this word does not currently come with any of that.
On the hard days
The loneliness of a small word is real and nobody warns you about it. You may go your whole life without meeting another person who uses it out loud.
People will tell you it is fake. Not just strangers — sometimes other queer people, who are tired of microlabels and have decided yours is the example. That one lands harder than it should, because you expected shelter there.
Then there is the explaining. Not the hostility, just the fatigue of the same conversation with a new person, again, and watching their face do the thing where they decide you are complicated.
Some days the contradiction stops being interesting and just feels like being illegible. You want to walk into a room and be read correctly by someone who has not been briefed, and that is not on offer.
There can be grief for a simpler life, too. A version of you that ticked a box and never thought about it again. That grief is not a sign you got it wrong.
What tends to help is unglamorous: one person who uses it right without a fuss, and the fact that the word is still accurate at 2am when nobody is watching. That is usually enough to go on with.
Questions people ask
Is ambonec the same as bigender?
No, though they are neighbours and plenty of people use both. Bigender is two genders — you can count them, and often you can feel the seam between them. Ambonec is one gender that includes man and woman and is also neither. If "there are two of me" rings true, bigender is your word. If "there is one of me and it is both and neither at the same time" rings true, this one is closer.
What pronouns do ambonec people use?
All of them, and none. There is no pronoun attached to the label. Common patterns: they/them; he and she used interchangeably on purpose because each is half right; neopronouns like ey/em or xe/xem; or name-only. Ask the person. If you are the person, try a set out loud with someone safe before you announce anything — pronouns are easier to test than to theorise about.
Is ambonec a real gender, or did someone make it up on Tumblr?
Both, and those are not opposites. It was coined online in the mid-2010s and the specific origin is not reliably documented. Usage is small — likely hundreds to low thousands, mostly online. What it names is not new; the sense of being both and neither at once shows up long before anyone gave it a Latin compound. A word being young does not make the experience young, and it also does not give it a history it hasn't earned yet.
Is there an ambonec pride flag?
Several designs circulate on gender wikis and image boards, and they do not agree with each other. None has settled enough that we are willing to print it here as the flag — printing the wrong one is worse than printing none. If you have one you use, use it. If you are looking for one, take whichever version your corner of the community actually uses, and know that someone elsewhere is using a different one in good faith.
Read next
You have probably read a list like this before. This one includes the parts that usually get left out: the forms, the money, the people…
Guide · 14 min readComing Out as Transgender or Non-Binary: A Complete GuideMost guides to coming out are about the sentence. This one is about everything around it: whether to say it at all, who gets it first…
This is not a clinical instrument, not a diagnosis, and not evidence of anything about anyone. It describes experiences so you can recognise your own — or rule them out.