Proxvir
Boyish, but not a boy. Masculine, but not male — standing right next to manhood without ever being inside it.
- One of twenty-eight Non-Binary identities
- No settled flag
- 14 min read
What it is
Proxvir means near-man. Prox- from the Latin for near, -vir from the Latin for man. The two phrases it was built around are "boyish, but not boy" and "masculine, but not male".
It points at a gender that stands beside maleness rather than inside it. Not half male. Not male-in-progress. Not a man with unusual hobbies. Something adjacent, with its own shape, that keeps almost matching the word man and never quite does.
Now the honest part, because you deserve it before you read three thousand words. Proxvir is a small word. It was coined on Tumblr in the mid-2010s — 2014 by most accounts — by a user called wulfgendur, alongside its counterpart juxera, meaning near-woman. It lives on a handful of wiki pages and a thinner handful of blog posts. There is almost no written record of anyone's ordinary life under it.
Keep reading
So what follows is drawn from the definition and from what near-male actually implies day to day, not from a large body of shared experience. There isn't one. Anyone who tells you what the proxvir community thinks is making it up.
The people who do use it disagree on the meaning. One reading: proxvir is near maleness, bordering it, almost touching. Another, which turns up on some wikis: proxvir is masculine but has no relationship to manhood at all — the masculinity is real, the manhood was never there to be near. Both are in circulation. One may describe you and the other may not.
It says nothing about what you were assigned at birth, what your body looks like, what you wear, or what you intend to do about any of it.
Pronouns
No pronoun set comes with this word. He/him is the most common by a distance, because it gets you treated as masculine without a conversation. They/them, he/they, mixed sets and neopronouns are all in use. Using he/him does not make you a man, and using they/them does not make you less masculine. Plenty of people run he/him in public and something else in their own head, or with two friends. If you are not out, the pronouns you were handed at birth are what you use, and that changes nothing about what you are.
Does this sound like you?
Take the test
Twenty questions, about four minutes, nothing leaves your phone. It suggests. You decide.
An ordinary day
Nothing about the day announces it.\n\nThe coffee place calls you mate, or sir, or bro, whatever your city runs on. You take it. It is the nearest thing on offer and it is free.\n\nWork chat has a pronoun field. You put he/him in it two years ago and have not touched it since. It is not a lie. It is just not the whole sentence, and the field is small.\n\nThe group chat says alright boys. You reply. There is a half-second — so short you stopped noticing it years ago — where you clock that you answered to something that is not your name.\n\nAt home the mirror is fine. Short hair, the clothes you settled on, whatever shape you have built. It reads masculine and that is what you wanted. Nobody watching would guess there is a word for the last five percent. Most days you do not think about it either.\n\nThat is the texture of it. Not anguish. A very small, very persistent almost.
What people get wrong
How it actually plays out
Love
You will spend a while deciding what a partner is allowed to call you. Boyfriend is the least wrong word English has and it is still wrong. Some people take it anyway, the way you take mate from the barista. Some ask for partner and mean it seriously.\n\nThe hard part is not finding someone accepting. It is being wanted precisely. Someone can be entirely kind and still be dating a slightly simplified version of you — a man, in their head, with a footnote they are too polite to mention.\n\nThere is a specific relief in someone who gets it without the footnote. It is rare. It is also not a reason to stay in something that is not working otherwise.\n\nYou owe nobody the word proxvir on a first date. "I'm non-binary, masculine side, he/him is fine" is a complete sentence and it gets you through most of dating. The Latin can come later or never.\n\nSome people reading this are not looking for a partner at all, now or ever. That is a way of living, not a gap in one.
Desire
If sex is not part of your life — by choice, by orientation, by circumstance — skip this. It is not a required component of anything here.\n\nFor everyone else: being wanted as a man can feel good and slightly off at the same time, like a compliment delivered in the wrong language. It rarely ruins anything. It just sits there in the room.\n\nWhat tends to work better is being wanted for the specific masculine thing you actually are — the way you move, the shape you built, the particular version of it that is yours — rather than for the category someone filed you under on the way in.\n\nNothing about roles follows from this label. Masculine-adjacent people top, bottom, switch, and do none of the above. The word describes who is in the bed, not what happens in it.\n\nOne practical thing: if certain words for your body are unbearable during sex, say so early and flatly. Most partners would rather be told than guess wrong at the worst possible moment.
The body
There is no proxvir body and no required amount of anything.\n\nSome people want a flat chest, a lower voice, hair on their face, and want none of it to add up to man. That combination is coherent, even when it confuses a doctor. You can want the masculine body without wanting the title that usually comes attached.\n\nSome feel almost nothing about their body and are puzzled that this is supposed to be part of it. That is a real way to be this. Not everything about gender is routed through flesh.\n\nWanting is not the same as access. Money, family, country, law, waiting lists — many people want things they will not get, and the wanting still counts. Nothing on this page requires a single appointment.\n\nIf you do go the medical route, you will probably have to say the word man to somebody in a clinic to get through the door. That is form-filling, not a confession. It does not overwrite what you know.
Work
Most workplaces will never hear this word, and that is a reasonable decision rather than cowardice.\n\nHe/him in a signature does a lot of quiet practical work. It stops the misgendering that actually stings and requires no seminar. Plenty of people run an entire professional life on it and are fine.\n\nBeing folded into the boys at work is a mixed thing. It is easier than the alternative and it is a slightly wrong shape, and you can enjoy the ease while still noticing the wrongness. Both are allowed at once.\n\nIf you do want to say something, the shortest useful version is: "I'm non-binary. He/him is fine." Almost nobody asks a follow-up. The few who do usually just want to get it right.\n\nAnd if you have no workplace, or work informally, or yours is the kind of place where none of this could ever be said out loud — none of the above is a standard you failed to meet.
Family
This is a word with no encyclopedia entry for a relative to look up. If you hand them the term, be ready for the search to come back thin, and for the thinness to be used as an argument against you.\n\nA door that opens more easily: "I'm not a woman. I'm not exactly a man either. Masculine, but not male." That is the definition anyway, minus the Latin.\n\nNot every language has a nearby word for this, and not every family lives somewhere it can be said safely. In some homes and some countries there is no version of this sentence that lands well. Staying quiet there is a survival calculation, not a failure of nerve.\n\nYou get to choose person by person. Telling one sibling and nobody else is a whole strategy, not half a coming out.\n\nIf you are financially or physically dependent on people who would react badly, the timing question is not about courage. It is about logistics.
Coming out
You may never say proxvir out loud to another human being. Words used by a few hundred people often stay private, doing their work inside one head — which is where most of the relief happens anyway.\n\nThere are layers and you can stop at any of them. Pronouns only. Non-binary only. Masculine but not male. And then, if you ever want it, the actual term.\n\nExpect the question: so are you a man or not. The honest answer — near enough for most purposes, no for the real one — sounds like dodging when it is the opposite of dodging. Keep a shorter version in your pocket for people who are not owed the long one.\n\nBe ready for a particular follow-up: "but that's just a made-up Tumblr word." You can agree and carry on. "Yes, someone made it up. It describes me." There is nothing to defend.\n\nNobody is required to submit their gender for a vote. Not out is a legitimate place to live, for a week or for the rest of your life.
Nearby identities
The distinction is the useful part. Names without a link don’t have a page yet.
The closest neighbour and the one most often confused with it. Demiboy means partly male — a genuine portion of your gender is man. Proxvir is not a portion of anything; it stands next to it. If partly fits you, take demiboy, and far more people will know what you mean.
Demiboy →The counterpart, coined by the same person at the same time: near-woman, feminine but not female. Identical shape, other side of the map.
Compare Proxvir and Juxera →How male you feel rises and falls, sometimes all the way to full. Proxvir does not move. The distance stays exactly the same size year after year.
Compare Proxvir and Boyflux →A direction of travel, not a gender: away from female, towards masculine. You can be proxvir and transmasc simultaneously. Transmasc describes where you are heading, not what you are.
Compare Proxvir and Transmasculine →No gender at all, or a deliberately neutral one. Proxvir has a gender and it is specifically masculine. If there is genuinely nothing there, this is not it.
Agender → · Neutrois →The umbrella above all of this. Proxvir is one small, specific spot underneath. If you want a single word that other people already understand, use this one in public and keep the precise one for yourself.
Compare Proxvir and Non-Binary →Not a synonym, though they can sit together in one person. Butch is a masculine way of being with deep roots in lesbian history and community. Proxvir is a claim about gender itself, not about how you carry it.
Compare Proxvir and Butch →Worth naming plainly. A soft man, a feminine man, a man who despises every masculine script going, is still a man. If man is the right word and only the performance feels wrong, you are a man with opinions, and this page is not yours.
It might not be you if…
- You feel partly male — an actual portion, not a proximity. Read demiboy first.
- You are a man. An unusual one, or a gentle one, or one who wants nothing to do with what men are supposed to be. That is a man having opinions about men, not a separate gender.
- The distance moves. Some weeks you are all the way in, some weeks nowhere near. Look at boyflux or genderfluid before this.
- You have no gender at all, and near male only describes how you present. Presentation and gender are different claims.
- It shows up mainly as a reaction — you feel near-male when someone calls you a woman, and barely think about it otherwise. That might be a response to the wrong word rather than the right one. Watch it for a few months when nobody is misgendering you.
- You are a trans man early on, and not quite a man feels safer to say than man. Very common, entirely understandable, and worth being honest with yourself about. Nothing bad happens if you take the bigger word later.
- You like it because it is rare and precise and nobody else you know has it. That pull is real. It is not the same thing as recognition.
- You had to read the definition four times to make it apply. Words for this are meant to land, not to be argued into position.
On the hard days
The specific loneliness of this one is bibliographic. You search the word at 2am and get four wiki pages, two of which contradict each other, and a listicle from years ago using genders like yours as a punchline. Nothing to read. Nobody's memoir. No forum where people are just living it.\n\nRare does not mean false. But thinness gets inside your head, and on a bad night it argues that a feeling with almost no literature behind it must be something you invented to be interesting.\n\nThen there is the near-miss, which is its own kind of tiredness. Being called something almost right, all day, for years, is heavier than being called something plainly wrong once. It never gives you a moment worth objecting to, so it never gets objected to.\n\nAnd the double exclusion. Men's spaces sense you are not quite in. Women's spaces keep claiming you back. Being welcome in both while belonging to neither wears at a particular spot.\n\nWhat helps is smaller than a word. One friend who says "you're not really a bloke, are you" and means it kindly. Someone seeing the gap and not needing it explained. That is usually enough to get through the night, and it does not require anyone to learn any Latin.
Questions people ask
Is proxvir the same as demiboy?
No, though people use both loosely and some use them together. Demiboy means partly male. Proxvir means beside male, with nothing inside. If partly fits, take demiboy — it is older, better documented, and far more people will know what you mean without a explanation.
Can I be proxvir and use he/him?
Yes, and most people who use the word do. Pronouns are a request about how you want to be spoken of, not a report on the contents of your gender. He/him is the smoothest available route to being treated as masculine without opening a conversation you may not want to have.
Can I be proxvir and medically transition?
Yes. Nothing in the term rules out testosterone, surgery, or a legal change. Wanting a masculine body is a separate matter from claiming manhood. Practically, you may have to use the word man with clinicians and forms to get treated — that is a gate, not a self-description.
Do you have to be AFAB to be proxvir?
No. Nothing in the definition mentions assignment at birth. The visible use has skewed towards people assigned female, but people assigned male who feel masculine and were never at home in manhood use it too, and the definition covers them cleanly.
Is proxvir a real gender, or did someone just make it up?
Both, honestly. It was coined on Tumblr around 2014 by a user called wulfgendur, along with juxera. Maybe a few hundred people have ever used it. That is the true scale. Real is the wrong question — the useful one is whether it makes your own life clearer. If it does, keep it. If you need a word other people already know, non-binary or transmasculine will do the public-facing work.
Read next
You have probably read a list like this before. This one includes the parts that usually get left out: the forms, the money, the people…
Guide · 14 min readComing Out as Transgender or Non-Binary: A Complete GuideMost guides to coming out are about the sentence. This one is about everything around it: whether to say it at all, who gets it first…
This is not a clinical instrument, not a diagnosis, and not evidence of anything about anyone. It describes experiences so you can recognise your own — or rule them out.